16 -
46
but no guarantee of accuracy can be given. Ex cathedra
statements have been made from time to time to the effect
that Canton will become the great outlet for the produce of all China south of the Yangtze. The Canton-Hankow Railway
Administration have expressed the opinion that the line will
attract the coal business and all other kinds of traffic
from the northern and central parts of the country to a more direct and therefore cheaper route to Canton and Hong
Kong and other points. I regret that I cannot subscribe to
these optimistic views. Traffic will only move by rail if it is able to bear the transportation costs involved. If
these costs exceed a certain limit, traffic will either
turn to other means of transportation or cease to move.
Water-borne rates are very moh less than rail-borne rates,
so that water transportation from Chuchow to Hankow and
from Hankow to Shanghai must always remain a powerful
competitor to the Railway. The latter will in my opinion
be used mainly for the transport of perishables, the
transport of valuable goods requiring maximum expedition,
those which command a reasonable price in relationship to
freight charges, those which are destined for shipment to
Manila and places west of Hong Kong, those which may be
distributed from either Canton or Hong Kong, and the trans-
port of goods of all classes from south of Hengehow.
Commodities not embraced in the above classification have a
far cheaper water-borne route via the Tung Ting Lake and
the Yangtze available for their movement. Hengehow, which
is midway between Canton and Hankow, may be considered the
economic divide from which most goods will flow either
north or south.
43. Bulk commodities such as coal, however, should
move south over the line provided the ton-mile rate is
sufficiently attractive.
A case in point is Leiyang coal
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.